Does a bigger World Cup mean more chaos?

The 2026 tournament added 16 teams and a 12-group stage. Comparing group-stage upset index (−log₂ of the model's probability of each result) for 2026 against the pooled 2002–2022 group stages — purely descriptive, no causal claim. ← all-time shocks

Verdict

The 48-team group stage produced +65% more big shocks (upset index ≥3.0) than 2002–2022 — 9.7% vs 5.9% — though the overall surprise distribution was statistically indistinguishable (Mann–Whitney p=0.18).

01234502550751002026 (48-team)2002–2022upset index →

Cumulative share of group-stage matches below each upset index. A curve to the RIGHT = more surprising matches.

Group stagenmedianmean ≥3.0 ≥4.61
2026 (48-team)720.941.319.7%0.0%
2002–2022 pooled2881.231.445.9%1.7%

Mann–Whitney U=9310, z=-1.34, p=0.180. The bigger field delivered a higher rate of large shocks, but 2026's typical (median) group match was actually calmer and it produced no beyond-resolution result — so the distributions as a whole are not statistically distinguishable.